covereng.jpg (10339 bytes)


Change Adds Flexibility to Accreditation Process

The College's Executive Committee will now have the authority to appoint up to three members of Council to an accreditation panel upon request by the Accreditation Committee.

The change to the College's bylaw will help the Accreditation Committee constitute panels for the accreditation of pre-service and in-service teacher education programs across the province. The bylaw previously gave the Executive Committee the authority to appoint Council members to French-language panels only because of the limited number of bilingual members on Council.

Council Adopts Proposed Accreditation Regulation

Council added a major building block in the development of the College's professional affairs activities at its February 24 meeting by adopting a proposed accreditation regulation under the Ontario College of Teachers Act. The regulation will now be submitted to the government for approval.

The accreditation regulation will be used to accredit all pre-service and in-service teacher education programs across the province. It will allow the College to require providers of pre-service and in-service teacher education programs to reflect the Standards of Practice for the Teaching Profession and meet standards prescribed by the College's Accreditation Committee in their programs.

"The accreditation process is the control mechanism that is going to ensure that teacher education programs are pertinent and that they efficiently prepare teachers for the challenges of their duties," said Accreditation Committee Chair Cecilia Reynolds. "Accredited programs will give the College the assurance that teachers have received the initial education they need and are competent."

Programs requesting accreditation from the College will have to comply with the requirements of Regulation 184/97 - Teachers Qualifications, in addition to the requirements of the Accreditation Committee.

Accredited programs will receive one of five awards: accreditation granted, accreditation granted with conditions, interim accreditation granted, interim accreditation granted with conditions and accreditation not granted.

Standards of Practice Become College Bylaw

Council agreed at its February 24 meeting to include the Standards of Practice for the Teaching Profession in the College's bylaws. The decision recognizes the importance of the standards under the Ontario College of Teachers Act and their accurate reflection of the profession.

"The Standards of Practice for the Teaching Profession are a cornerstone of our pre-service and in-service accreditation process," said Standards of Practice and Education Committee Chair Clarice West-Hobbs. "With the standards entrenched in our bylaws, we are ensuring that they apply to all members of the College and reflect their professionalism. We are also telling future teachers this is what it means to be a teacher."

The Standards of Practice for the Teaching Profession are available on the College's web site at www.oct.ca/english/professional_affairs/standards.htm. They are also available in a printed version in limited quantities.

Discipline Decision

A panel of the College's Discipline Committee has ordered this summary of a recent disciplinary case to be published in Professionally Speaking.

Member: David James Perryman
Decision: Certificates of Qualification and Registration Revoked

A panel of the College's Discipline Committee held a public hearing February 28, 2000 into allegations of professional misconduct against David James Perryman, 46, of Orangeville. Perryman was a 20-year veteran elementary school teacher for the Upper Grand District Board of Education, formerly the Dufferin County Board of Education.

The allegations of professional misconduct against Perryman included failing to maintain the standards of the profession, failure to comply with the Education Act, contravening a law that is relevant to his suitability to hold Certificates of Qualification and Registration, committing acts that would be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable and unprofessional and engaging in conduct unbecoming a member.

The allegations against Perryman arose out of a series of incidents involving a young girl, aged 10 to 16 at the time of the incidents, who attended the school where Perryman taught, but was not his student.

Perryman made a statement and submitted letters of support to the discipline panel at the beginning of the hearing, after which he chose to leave.

The panel heard evidence from the victim that Perryman tried to touch her breasts on a number of occasions, made comments of a sexual nature and engaged in sexual intercourse with her on two occasions. The victim also testified that Perryman said to her that he would be her teacher with respect to sexual activity.

The panel also heard that the teacher was charged with indecent assault under the Criminal Code of Canada in November 1996. In June 1998, Perryman pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of assault in connection with six incidents read into the court record. He was sentenced to 45 days imprisonment to be served in the community, with specified terms and conditions.

The College's discipline panel found that Perryman does not appreciate the significance of his conduct outside the classroom and that he is guilty of professional misconduct. The panel ordered his Certificates of Qualification and Registration revoked. The decision of the panel will appear on the College's public register.

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6